The Politics of Food: Hungry for Votes
How much do rich governments really worry about feeding the world?
Jan 27th 2011 | WASHINGTON, DC | from The Economist
LIKE national defence, securing food supplies usually counts as a core task of government. Hence, as prices surge, food security is rising to the top of the political agenda. Or so it sounds.
On January 24th the British government’s chief scientific officer said that “the case for urgent action in the global food system is now compelling.” He was presenting a report from hundreds of scientists that concluded with “a stark warning for both current and future decision-makers on the consequences of inaction—food production and the food system must assume a much higher priority in political agendas across the world.”
Politicians say they are listening. “If we don’t do anything,” France’s president Nicolas Sarkozy said on the same day, “we run the risk of food riots in the poorest countries and a very unfavourable effect on global economic growth.”
Companies are attentive, too. At the Davos gathering of the self-proclaimed great and good a few days later, a score of firms, including seed companies, food processors and grain traders proclaimed: “The world needs a new vision for agriculture.” They promised to work with farmers and governments to boost farm output, cut emissions and reduce rural poverty, all (in an amazing coincidence) by 20% each decade. Amid this sense of renewed urgency, though, lurks fear: that politicians will prove as fickle about food today as they have been in the past.