Deputy Secretary of State Jacob Lew and US Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today on Obama's Afghanistan strategy.
Lew said that as part of the new strategy, the State Department would "continue to expand our programs to bolster Afghanistan’s agricultural sector – the traditional core of the Afghan economy - focusing on increasing farmers' productivity and ability to enter higher value markets," as well as "greatly building the Ministry of Agriculture’s capacity to deliver extension and other services." With regard to Pakistan, Lew said that State would "assist Pakistan to address the country’s profound infrastructure needs with highly visible projects in energy and agriculture."
Ambassador Eikenberry remarked that "development specialists at USAID, joined by experts from multiple departments and agencies of our government, are focusing on key sectors, such as agriculture." Calling the rebuilding of the Afghan farm sector "essential," Ambassador Eikenberry noted that the U.S. governments estimates that "at least 80 percent of the Afghan population derives their income, either directly or indirectly, from agriculture." He also said that he would be working with the Afghan Agriculture Ministry to reinforce the administration's "good governance strategy."
Please click here for more information about the Obama administration's policies towards agriculture in Afghanistan, and here to view more Congressional testimony concerning agricultural development, food security, and other related issues.
Expert Commentary - Climate, Copenhagen and Food Security
Director for Economic Analysis at the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and Research Professor at the Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University. Bio
It is 10 pm Friday in Copenhagen as I look out my window at the Bella Center, where world leaders are still trying to hammer out an international agreement on climate change. Today President Obama addressed the assembled leadership and argued that failure to forge an agreement would not only create profound environmental threats to our society, but would represent a demonstrable failure of global collective action to address large existential threats.
At this stage, I feel a bit like a sports reporter filing his story before the game has ended. But deadlines loom and there is a lot more to the story than the final score. Among the key sub-plots of Copenhagen is how global agriculture and food security will be affected by the success or failure of the global agreement. One can look at this from the three lenses through which climate policy is traditionally viewed.
Continue reading "Expert Commentary - Climate, Copenhagen and Food Security" »
Posted at 05:13 PM in Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | |